paper-doc/docs/OVERVIEW.md

paper-doc

A tool that supports the paper-writing process: it manages the materials, sections, figures, and references that go into a paper. The name reflects the document-centric core of the workflow — a paper is composed from structured documents rather than written in one pass.

The first feature to land is the template configuration: a reusable library of section fields plus named templates built from them, so that a paper is written by filling in a known structure instead of deciding one.

The second is paper authoring: a paper is a document written against a template, sentence by sentence, paragraph by paragraph. The structure is never copied into the paper — it is read from the template on every render — so switching a paper's template re-shapes the whole document in one write without touching a single sentence.

Tech Stack

Backend

• FastAPI (Python) — REST API
• SQLAlchemy + Alembic — ORM layer and schema migrations
• TiDB v8.5.0 — MySQL-compatible distributed SQL database, deployed in k3s
• Dependencies managed with venv + requirements.txt

Frontend

• Vue 3 + Vite — single-page application
• axios — HTTP client
• vue-router — client-side routing
• pinia + pinia-plugin-persistedstate — state management with persistence
• Element Plus — UI component library
• Dependencies managed with pnpm

Architecture

A decoupled SPA + REST API layout:

• The Vue SPA runs in the browser and talks to the backend exclusively over HTTP/JSON via axios. It holds no direct database access.
• The FastAPI backend owns all persistence. It connects to TiDB through SQLAlchemy sessions and owns the schema through Alembic migrations.
• TiDB runs inside the existing k3s cluster. The backend reaches it either through the in-cluster Service (tidb-tidb.tidb:4000) or, during local development, through the NodePort 192.168.1.88:32738.

Development runs both parts locally: Vite serves the SPA with a dev proxy that forwards /api to the FastAPI process, so the browser sees a single origin and no CORS configuration is required.

Browser ──HTTP/JSON──▶ FastAPI ──SQLAlchemy──▶ TiDB (k3s)
   │                      ▲
   └── Vite dev server ───┘  (proxy /api)

Domain Model

Six tables, and one rule that the last three follow from.

section_field                     the reusable heading library
  id, name, level, font_size, font_color

paper_template                    a named outline
  id, name, abstract

template_field                    the join, and the only home of display order
  id, template_id → paper_template, field_id → section_field, sort

paper                             the document
  id, title, template_id, abstract, author, status, keywords,
  target_journal

paper_sentence                    one sentence, at one position, in one paper
  id, paper_id → paper, template_id, paper_template_filed_sort, sort, content

paper_sentence_reference          the citations of one sentence
  id, sentence_id → paper_sentence, reference_id, quote, sort

The field library is flat, not a tree

section_field has no parent_id. Hierarchy is expressed only by level (1 for 1., 2 for 1.1), which is a rendering hint: it drives indentation and numbering semantics in the UI and nothing else.

The reason is reuse. With a parent pointer a level-2 heading would belong to exactly one level-1 heading, so "Background" could not sit under both 1. Introduction and 2. Related Work. Flat fields are attached to templates, not to each other, so one field can appear in any number of templates, in a different position in each.

The numbering a reader sees is part of name and is written by the user ("1. Introduction", "0 Abstract"). Nothing derives or rewrites it.

Display order lives in the join table

template_field.sort is a plain ascending integer and is the only thing that decides what order a template's fields appear in. The order the user clicked fields in is never stored, so selecting 字段1, 字段2.1, 字段2, 字段1.1 and setting sorts 1, 4, 3, 2 renders as 字段1, 字段1.1, 字段2, 字段2.1.

Two consequences are deliberate:

• There is no unique constraint on (template_id, field_id). Placing the same field twice in one template is a legitimate layout — the same level-2 heading under two different level-1 headings. The UI warns about a repeat; it does not forbid one.
• Ties are legal. Equal sort values are broken by insertion order, so the ordering is always total and stable. The UI warns about ties too, and offers a button that renumbers the selection 1..N.

Templates hold references, not copies

template_field points at a library field; it does not snapshot its name or typography. Renaming or restyling a field therefore updates every template that places it, which is what makes "fix the template and the section names follow" work.

A sentence is addressed by position, not by field id

paper_sentence.paper_template_filed_sort holds the sort of the template placement the sentence belongs to — not template_field.id, and not section_field.id. Together with sort, the sentence's own position inside that paragraph, it is everything needed to place a line of text.

The indirection is the feature. Two templates have no rows in common, but they can share a position, so a sentence that remembers "I sit at position 7" lands on whatever the new template puts at position 7 when the paper is switched. The alternative — pointing at a placement row — would make every sentence belong to one template and turn a switch into a re-mapping of every line.

Three behaviours fall out of that one choice:

• The structure exists before the content. A paragraph is any position the template defines or any position a sentence occupies, so an unwritten paragraph still renders, empty, and a paper created a second ago already has its full shape.
• A switch destroys nothing. Positions the new template does not define are still rendered, in their place in the order, under the heading 未设定. Switch back and the old headings return, because the sentences never moved.
• Ties and gaps are fine. Sentences may share a sort (broken by id) and may be numbered 10, 20, 30 to leave room, exactly as template_field.sort allows.

The name paper_template_filed_sort keeps the spelling the feature was specified with; it is the template field's sort (the sort column of template_field). paper_sentence.template_id is the template the sentence was written against. It is kept in step with the paper's current template and is provenance rather than a lookup key: rendering never filters on it, which is precisely why content survives a switch.

Citations are a table, not a column

One sentence may quote several references, so paper_sentence_reference holds one row per citation. quote — 引用内容 — is required and must not be blank: a citation that does not say what it quotes is rejected with 422 rather than stored as a half-record. reference_id is a plain nullable integer with no foreign key, because the reference library does not exist yet; a citation may therefore be written now and linked later.

TiDB does not enforce foreign keys

TiDB parses FOREIGN KEY for compatibility and then ignores it. The constraints are declared to document the relationships, and the integrity they would provide is enforced in the application layer instead:

• deleting a field still placed in a template is refused with 409, naming the field and how many templates use it;
• deleting a template that a paper is written against is refused with 409, naming the template and how many papers use it — the template is that paper's structure, so removing it would empty the paper rather than tidy up;
• creating a template that references a missing field is refused with 400, and creating or patching a paper that references a missing template likewise;
• PaperTemplate.items, Paper.sentences and PaperSentence.citations all use cascade="all, delete-orphan", so deleting a row removes its dependents.

API

All routes are mounted under /api. Interactive docs at /docs.

Method	Path	Notes
GET	/health	liveness plus a TiDB probe
GET	/section-fields	keyword, level, page, page_size
POST	/section-fields	create
GET PATCH DELETE	/section-fields/{id}	read / partial update / delete
POST	/section-fields/batch-delete	body { "ids": [...] }
GET	/templates	keyword matches name or abstract
POST	/templates	name + abstract + ordered fields
GET PATCH DELETE	/templates/{id}	PATCH with fields replaces the selection
POST	/templates/batch-delete	body { "ids": [...] }
GET	/papers	keyword matches title/author/keywords, plus status, template_id
POST	/papers	title + template + author/status/keywords/journal; no sentence rows are created
GET PATCH DELETE	/papers/{id}	PATCH with template_id is the template switch
POST	/papers/batch-delete	body { "ids": [...] }
GET	/papers/{id}/document	the whole paper: paragraphs in order, citations, warnings
GET	/papers/{id}/paragraphs/{sort}	one paragraph, assembled as the document renders it
PUT	/papers/{id}/paragraphs/{sort}	full replacement; optional target_sort moves it
POST	/papers/{id}/sentences	append one sentence
PATCH DELETE	/papers/{id}/sentences/{id}	edit or remove one sentence

Conventions worth knowing:

• font_color is stored and returned as canonical #RRGGBB. The API also accepts rgb(r, g, b), #rgb and bare aabbcc, and normalises them on write.
• font_size is a JSON number, not a string — a client should not have to parse it before using it in a CSS rule.
• List endpoints return { items, total, page, page_size, pages }.
• A template read returns fields already ordered by sort; clients never sort.
• A paper document returns its paragraphs in ascending position order, already carrying their sentences and citation numbering. The client sorts nothing and merges nothing: two implementations of the same ordering rule would eventually disagree.
• Sentence content is folded to a single line (leading, trailing and inner whitespace runs collapse to one space), so an all-whitespace sentence becomes the empty string — legal, and rendered as a blank line. A citation with a blank quote is refused with 422.
• keywords is stored as a canonical , -joined string; ，、; and ； are accepted on write and de-duplicated.
• Paper status is one of draft, writing, done.

Frontend

Shell

┌───────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ [mark] paper-doc  │  论文   模板                    [mk] │  header
├───────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────┤
│  论文             │                                      │  second-level
│   论文列表        │  <RouterView>                        │  menu, left
│   新建论文        │                                      │
│   ── 我的论文 ──  │                                      │
│   ● 论文标题 A    │                                      │
│   ● 论文标题 B    │                                      │
└───────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────────┘
       <- 208px ->

The mark appears at both ends of the header. The second-level menu sits on the left and is driven by route.meta.section, so a route declares which menu it belongs to and deep links render correctly on first paint. Routes without a section (the welcome page) show no menu.

The 论文 menu is the one that is not a static list: it carries the papers themselves, read from the papers store, so a paper can be opened straight from the rail. Every page that creates, renames or deletes a paper reloads that store, which is what keeps the rail and the table showing the same thing. A filter box appears once there are more than six papers.

Two things about this layout are deliberate and easy to break by accident:

• Which side the menu lands on follows from its DOM order inside the flex row in App.vue — first child, left. Moving it is a one-block change there, not a stylesheet override.
• The logo block is exactly as wide as the rail. Both read asideWidth() from src/layout.ts, so they cannot drift apart, and collapsing the rail narrows the logo block with it (dropping the wordmark and centring the mark). The header's own padding is zeroed for this; the two insets come from ASIDE_INSET so the mark lines up with the section title below it.

The column also carries through to the content: the rail is 208px and both the top nav's first item and .el-main are inset a further 20px by their own Element Plus defaults, so the menu text, the page body, and the page header all start on the same vertical line.

Shell metrics

src/layout.ts is the single source for the rail's width and inset. It is a module rather than CSS custom properties because el-aside takes its width through a prop, which would otherwise fight an inline style coming from the stylesheet.

Routes

Path	View	Section
/	welcome	—
/papers	paper table + CRUD (?new=1 opens the create dialog)	papers
/papers/:id	one paper, read as a document	papers
/templates	redirects to /templates/list	—
/templates/list	template table + CRUD	templates
/templates/fields	field library + CRUD	templates

The paper view

PapersView is the library; papers/PaperDetailView is the writing surface. The detail view renders the server's document verbatim and adds three things it alone knows how to do:

• an edit button beside every paragraph, written or not — content only ever enters a paper through the paragraph editor, so it may never be the thing that is missing;
• numbered citation markers in the text, matching the 参考文献 list, which is numbered in reading order rather than per paragraph;
• a 切换模板 dialog that previews the impact — how much content lands under a new heading, how much keeps its place under 未设定, and how many empty paragraphs the new template adds — because a switch re-shapes the whole document in one write.

Changing a paper's template from the metadata form is deliberately disabled: a silent re-shape of the document is exactly what the preview exists to prevent.

Directory Structure

paper-doc/
├── backend/                 # FastAPI application
│   ├── app/
│   │   ├── api/routes/      # route handlers (health, papers, section_fields, templates)
│   │   ├── core/            # settings and configuration
│   │   ├── crud/            # data-access helpers
│   │   ├── db/              # engine, session, declarative base
│   │   ├── models/          # SQLAlchemy models
│   │   └── schemas/         # Pydantic request/response models
│   ├── alembic/             # migration environment and revisions
│   ├── scripts/seed.py      # idempotent seed for the field library + templates
│   ├── scripts/smoke_papers.py  # end-to-end check of the writing loop
│   ├── alembic.ini
│   ├── requirements.txt
│   └── .env.example
├── frontend/                # Vue 3 SPA
│   ├── src/
│   │   ├── api/             # axios instance and endpoint modules
│   │   ├── components/      # shell, field, template and paper components
│   │   ├── router/          # vue-router configuration
│   │   ├── stores/          # pinia stores (UI prefs persisted, the paper list not)
│   │   ├── styles/          # global reset and the shell viewport contract
│   │   ├── utils/           # formatting helpers
│   │   └── views/           # route-level components (papers/, templates/)
│   ├── package.json
│   └── vite.config.ts
└── docs/                    # project documentation
    └── OVERVIEW.md

Getting Started

Prerequisites

• Python 3.10+ with venv
• Node.js 18+ with pnpm
• Network access to the TiDB instance (local development uses the NodePort)

Backend

cd backend
python3 -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
cp .env.example .env          # then fill in the database credentials
uvicorn app.main:app --reload --port 8000

API docs are then served at http://127.0.0.1:8000/docs.

Frontend

cd frontend
pnpm install
pnpm dev

The SPA is served at http://127.0.0.1:5173 and proxies /api to the backend on port 8000.

Database

The paper_doc database is created once, out of band, against TiDB. Schema changes are applied through Alembic:

cd backend
alembic upgrade head

Seed data

scripts/seed.py fills the field library with a standard academic outline (20 fields, from 0 Abstract to 7 References) and creates three starter templates. It matches fields and templates by name, so running it twice adds nothing:

cd backend
.venv/bin/python scripts/seed.py            # add anything missing
.venv/bin/python scripts/seed.py --reset    # empty the tables first

Checking the paper feature end to end

scripts/smoke_papers.py walks the whole writing loop against a running API — create a paper on a template, verify the empty structure, fill a paragraph with sentences and citations, switch the template, check that unmatched positions survive under an unset heading, move a paragraph, and delete it all again. It exits non-zero on the first failed expectation and cleans up after itself:

cd backend
.venv/bin/python scripts/smoke_papers.py