Two tables were named after the concept they came from rather than the module
they belong to, so the schema read as if the template tables were part of the
paper module. Renamed (data preserved, `RENAME TABLE` moves rows in place):
paper_template -> template the 模板 module
section_field -> template_field_library the 字段库 the 模板 module owns
The paper tables and `template_field` already followed the rule. The rename
carries through everything that named a module:
models Template, TemplateField, TemplateFieldLibrary
schemas Template*, TemplateFieldLibrary*
crud app/crud/template.py, app/crud/template_field_library.py
API /template-field-library (was /section-fields); handlers are now
named after library entries, which removes the ambiguity with
TemplateField — a placement, a different thing entirely
client src/api/templateFieldLibrary.ts
`paper_template_filed_sort` is deliberately untouched: it is a column of the
paper module, spelled as the feature was specified.
TiDB v8.5 with tidb_enable_foreign_key on — as this cluster runs — enforces
foreign keys rather than ignoring them, so the docs' "TiDB does not enforce
foreign keys" was wrong. Corrected, with what actually follows from it: the
rename was rehearsed (RENAME TABLE carries a referencing constraint along), the
API keeps checking first so a violation names the row instead of surfacing a
driver error, and the ORM cascades stay so behaviour does not depend on a
cluster setting.
Revision f27a1c6d9e04 verified both ways; 40 smoke checks, type-check and build
all pass.
A paper is a document written against a template. Its structure is never
copied into it: `paper` points at a template and the outline is read live on
every render, so switching `template_id` re-shapes the whole document in one
write.
Sentences are addressed by *position* rather than by a template row id:
`paper_sentence.paper_template_filed_sort` holds the sort of the placement the
sentence belongs to, and `sort` holds its place inside that paragraph. That
indirection is what makes a template switch non-destructive — a sentence that
remembers "position 7" lands on whatever the new template puts at position 7 —
and it is why a paragraph is any position either the template or the content
mentions: the structure survives with no content, and content whose position
the template does not define is still rendered, in order, under 未设定.
Citations are a table rather than a column, since one sentence may quote
several references. `quote` is required — a citation that does not say what it
quotes is refused with 422 — while `reference_id` is a plain nullable integer
with no foreign key, because the reference library does not exist yet.
Deleting a template a paper is written against is refused with 409 and a count,
matching how the field library refuses to drop a field still in use.
scripts/smoke_papers.py walks the whole loop — create, empty structure, write a
paragraph with citations, switch templates, keep unmatched positions, move a
paragraph, delete — in 40 checks, and cleans up after itself.
Three tables behind the template configuration feature:
section_field the reusable heading library (name, level, font size,
colour)
paper_template a named outline (name, abstract)
template_field the join, and the only home of display order (sort)
The field library is deliberately flat. A `parent_id` would tie a level-2
heading to exactly one level-1 heading, and the point of the feature is that
a field such as "Background" can sit under both "1. Introduction" and
"2. Related Work" — and in any number of templates, at a different position
in each. Hierarchy is expressed only by `level`, which is a rendering hint.
Display order lives entirely in `template_field.sort`. The order fields were
picked in is never stored, so selecting fields out of order and assigning
sorts renders in sort order. Two consequences are intentional and documented
on the model: repeats are allowed (no unique constraint on template+field)
and ties are legal (broken by insertion order, so the ordering is total).
Templates reference library fields rather than copying them, so renaming or
restyling a field updates every template that places it.
TiDB parses FOREIGN KEY and then ignores it, so the constraints are declared
for documentation and the integrity is enforced in the application layer:
deleting a field still in use is refused with the field names, creating a
template against a missing field is refused, and deleting a template removes
its join rows through the ORM's delete-orphan cascade.
Also normalises font_color to #RRGGBB on write (accepting rgb() and
shorthand) and emits font_size as a JSON number rather than pydantic's
default Decimal string.
scripts/seed.py is idempotent and fills the library with a standard academic
outline plus three starter templates.
govin